Tuesday, April 1, 2025

From Lehman to Liberation, don't trust first takes

To get John Authers' newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here. Liberation Day is here! Why does it feel as ominous as Lehma
View in browser
Bloomberg

To get John Authers' newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here.

Today's Points:

Liberation Day Minus One

It's been a while since a moment quite this extreme has loomed before us. President Donald Trump's Liberation Day isn't a binary event, as there is a range of tariff policies he could announce, from the merely symbolic and performative through to actions that could transform the entire global economy. The possibility of the former can't be dismissed; the risk of the latter is still far from reflected in markets

It's a mug's game to to analyze a decision due within a matter of hours. We have to wait and be prepared to react. The best analogy in my experience was the Lehman Weekend of September 2008, when traders left on Friday knowing that their world might change if Lehman Brothers couldn't be rescued by Monday. It wasn't. With no good precedents, the implications of Lehman's bankruptcy rolled out over a matter of days, driving a massive selloff and soon forcing a change of direction by the US government. As I wrote that Friday, the "long view" was "anything that went much past Sunday evening."

Liberation Day could prove just as transformative, in a good or bad way, or it might be a non-event. Whatever happens, don't trust the initial market reaction. Somehow, the S&P 500 finished the week of the Lehman bankruptcy higher than it had started, thanks to the government's TARP rescue plan. That was a false move:

We all need to keep our wits about is in the days ahead. There's some suggested tariff reading in the Survival Tip. Beyond that, we'll await the facts before trying to analyze further. There are some other, more established things to cover.

US Manufacturers: Already Liberated

The Liberation Day hype has already had real-world consequences. That was clear from the latest Institute of Supply Managers survey of US manufacturers, published Tuesday. The overall number fell, suggesting a growing risk of recession. But the eye-catching data came on the balance between new orders and inventories. As the chart shows, inventories exceed new orders by the greatest amount in four decades, with the sole exceptions of the worst months of the Global Financial Crisis and the Covid lockdowns:

This is not healthy. If companies have a lot of stuff on hand, and few orders, they will likely do less business and activity will fall. By contrast, when inventories are low, there's a chance of a restocking boom as companies ramp up to meet demand. On this occasion, tariffs are an obvious explanation. Companies brought forward their imports to beat duties. They now have excessive inventories and the odds are that they'll be reducing production in the months ahead. That could be a total blip when it turns out tariffs don't change the landscape much; it might be transitory, as they soon return to old practices but now paying tariffs on goods they import; or it might prove to be a lasting change. On its face, however, it's bad.

The other disconcerting reading was on the prices-paid component of the index, which shot up, much as in 2021 when inflation was taking root. Tariff uncertainty is the likely explanation as companies fight over prices ahead of possible duties. What's most interesting is that while US manufacturers are having to pay more for inputs, their counterparts in the rest of the world are not. This chart is from Ariane Curtis, senior global economist at Capital Economics: 

Manufacturers elsewhere will have to await news on retaliation by their own governments, so it makes sense that the US encounters this issue first. For now, it makes US assets less attractive, and points toward a nasty dose of stagflation. Retaliation can be expected to turn the other lines upward.

Consumers are also bringing forward purchases to beat tariffs. Last month's vehicle sales were the best since the brief boom after the pandemic. It may be best to assume this is early rather than additional consumption:

The government also released the start of a welter of data on the jobs market. The JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) arrives with a lag, but it tended to douse concerns about either inflation or a recession. Total openings are down from the post-pandemic extreme, meaning that inflationary wage pressure should decline, but the quits rate, regarded as an indicator of how confident workers are, has returned to normal levels:

Less-lagged private sector surveys confirm this picture. The index of new listings kept by job-search site Indeed shows vacancies right back where they were four years ago. That should make life easier for the Federal Reserve:

The known unknown is the impact of the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) layoffs. The JOLTS federal government layoff rate has just jumped to its highest since Covid. This remains far below the level during the pandemic, or from 2010 when government cut back in the wake of the crisis. It could prove transitory. But it's a point of concern: 

Standard Chartered's Steven Englander suggests that unemployment numbers could be affected by a bad winter that left many workers unable to work due to weather, while another signature Trump policy, an immigration clampdown, will also affect payrolls gradually.

There's surprisingly good news from Europe. The latest inflation data, despite the money being splashed around there, are truly encouraging. Core inflation is close to the European Central Bank's target, while services inflation has dropped to 3.4% (in the US, it's still at 4.1%).

If there's a need for relief from the ECB in the months ahead, in the form of lower rates, it looks as if it will be available.

The Dollar: What Hath Trump Wrought?

This is the day Trump has made. The whole way he's chosen to present his tariff package, with hints and dribbles of information leading to a big reveal, has been designed to heighten excitement and attention — and with it uncertainty. The latest tidbit is that tariffs will go into effect immediately, so this announcement isn't the first stage of a negotiation.

And the markets are not remotely glad, nor do they have much to rejoice in. As the ISM surveys show, tariff excitement has sowed doubts and dampened activity. That leads to one of the moment's great conundrums: The dollar should rise when uncertainty is high, because it's a haven, and the prospect of US tariffs should also cause it to rise. So how did it fall 4.7% in the first quarter? 

Whatever drove this performance is unlikely to disappear once the president liberates us. The dollar in the last week has shown feeble signs of strengthening, without coming close to reclaiming its peak: 

Part of the surprise is the huge boost Germany administered to the euro with last month's borrowing package, which effectively meant getting its retaliation in first. There's also the fact that Trump has already shifted position on tariffs many times; his word may not be final. Mizuho Bank's Jordan Rochester argues that countries may be able to negotiate a better position later on:

Risk sentiment may cling to any statement that suggests these tariffs may be rolled back. And the hit to EU export competitiveness could act as a trigger to push for sweeping reforms (à la Draghi plan), with China's BYD already a wakeup call for European autos. We've already had the German spending response we expected to get in reaction to tariffs, but we admit we thought it was a Q2 story.

Any boost for the dollar will likely be primarily at the expense of emerging markets currencies. Barclays Bank's Themistoklis Fiotakis believes that Asian currencies are at greatest risk, given the large, indirect export exposure of countries like Vietnam to the US. However, PGIM Fixed Income analysts argue that, while we need to understand the "thick tails" — big possibilities of extreme outcomes in either direction — it's not a given that EM will be a clear loser. A base case of lower US rates, ultimately leading to dollar weakness, should provide them with a decent backdrop.

But first, getting tough on ticket scalping. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg

What exact version of tariffs has the dollar priced in? Bank of America's Athanasios Vamvakidis and Claudio Piron argue that the market expects tariffs on selective products, so across the board would be a nasty surprise. Trump has been playing down a draconian approach and assured all and sundry that he will be "kind." Should he nevertheless adopt the all-encompassing route, Vamvakidis doesn't expect a sustained strong dollar, as this would intensify fears for US growth:

Implementation of new tariffs could also take time because of difficult logistics, which would leave room for negotiations. End-quarter rebalancing can still support the USD next week, but we would expect investors to sell the rally. Our main concern is "something breaking" from aggressive tariffs, triggering a tail risk of a sharp market.

But the strongest argument for a weaker dollar is that a trade war — if that's what lies ahead — has no winners. It's popular to argue that the US economy wouldn't suffer as much as others because trade is a small proportion of the relatively closed economy, but Vamvakidis argues that this is invalid.  For the rest of the world, only their exports to the US will be hit by high tariffs, while most US exports stand to be affected — and more or less by definition, nobody stands to be hit worse than the US consumer. 

Richard Abbey

Survival Tips

As we can't liberate ourselves from talking about tariffs today, here's some reading and listening that can help you talk about this more interestingly. For the case against tariffs, former Obama adviser Jason Furman in the New York Times and veteran Republican economist Peter Morici in MarketWatch come up with equally devastating arguments; the National Taxpayers Union, a libertarian group, published this open letter against tariffs from a coalition of tax advocacy groups; and the great UK economist Gavyn Davies examines what we mean by tariff uncertainty in a piece for Fulcrum Asset Management. The sacred texts of the Trump team's new approach are Stephen Miran's white paper and Scott Bessent's appearance on the All-In podcast. For the history behind US protectionism, I can't recommend Helen Thompson on the These Times podcast enough. 

More From Bloomberg Opinion:

  • Jonathan Levin: Reciprocal Tariffs? We've Seen This Movie Before
  • Lionel Laurent: Le Pen's MAGA-Style Martyrdom Is New Risk in France
  • Parmy Olson: Tech Billionaires Need a Break From Their Reality-Distortion Fields

Want more Bloomberg Opinion? OPIN. Or you can subscribe to our daily newsletter.

Like Bloomberg's Points of Return? Subscribe for unlimited access to trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and gain expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters like Markets Daily or Odd Lots.

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Points of Return newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Forecast: Get used to uncertainty

Plus, a prediction markets review. View in browser Welcome back to The Forecast , wh...