Sunday, May 31, 2026

AMD: +389% in 5 days, spotted before it moved

The traders who caught it weren't reading the news. They were reading something else.  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
fb tw ig yt
 

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

PO Box 24790
Christiansted, Virgin Islands 00824, U.S. Virgin Islands

Terms of Service

The Next Space Race

In today's Masters Series, adapted from the July 2025 issue of Stansberry Venture Technology, Dave Lashmet reveals the race for "Internet lasers"...
Stansberry Research Logo
Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999

Editor's note: The first "space race" kicked off in the 1950s. Now, Stansberry Venture Technology editor Dave Lashmet says we're seeing the next space race... and it could revolutionize how we send and receive data.

In today's Masters Series, adapted from the July 2025 issue of Stansberry Venture Technology, Dave reveals the race for "Internet lasers"...


The Next Space Race

By Dave Lashmet, editor, Stansberry Venture Technology

The space race started with a "beep."

On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched the world's first artificial satellite into space.

Sputnik 1 weighed 184 pounds... orbited Earth every 90 minutes... and emitted a series of "beeps" while passing overhead. Radio operators on the ground quickly played the broadcast around the world.

The message stoked America's worst fears. The Soviet Union had beaten us into space and was winning the arms race to have superior technology.

The U.S. launched its own satellite and created NASA to focus on space exploration a few months later. But the Soviets continued to lead the way by sending the first person into space and orbit around the Earth.

So on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy challenged the U.S. to be the first to send a man to the moon. And on July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong became the first person to walk on the moon.

The space race sparked innovation in everything from computers to medicine to homebuilding and food safety. Solar panels, artificial limbs, infrared thermometers, digital photography, and GPS are just a few of the advances we've seen thanks to the space race and NASA.

Today, we're seeing the next space race... and it could revolutionize how we send and receive data.

You see, Europe, China, the U.S. Space Force, and companies like EchoStar (SATS) and SpaceX are all building their own low-Earth-orbit ("LEO") satellite networks to provide high-speed Internet from space.

SpaceX is one of the world's best-known space companies. Its reusable Falcon rockets revolutionized space flight by radically cutting its cost and increasing the pace of space launches. And its Starlink constellation has brought the Internet to tens of thousands of folks in remote areas.

Starlink uses thousands of satellites in LEO to beam the Internet from space to anyone who buys the right satellite dish and subscribes. SpaceX's approach has been quantity over quality. Instead of a single 10-ton, billion-dollar satellite, SpaceX built and launched more than 9,000 500-pound satellites into orbit.


Recommended Links:

June 4: Major BUY Alert Coming Before SpaceX IPO

The SpaceX IPO is days away... Space stocks are ripping higher... And the NASA ETF is up nearly 70% in eight weeks. But the man behind the most profitable research in Stansberry Research history says most investors are about to make a serious mistake. On June 4, he's breaking nearly four years of public silence to share what he calls the most important buy call of his career, and a make-or-break issue for Elon Musk that no one is talking about. Learn more here.


A New 'Super-Signal' for the Most Dangerous Market in 50 Years

The S&P 500 just whipsawed 8% in months... Ten stocks now make up 40% of the entire index... And consumer sentiment is showing its lowest reading in 74 years. That's exactly why Wall Street legend Marc Chaikin and master trader Jonathan Rose are joining forces for the first time with a new "Smart Money Super-Signal." This new tool is designed to give you 10 chances to double your money over the next 12 months. Find out more here.


In practice, each Starlink satellite is like a 4G cellular tower floating in space. It uses solar panels and batteries for power, some station-keeping gear, and an ion-drive engine.

But each satellite can only serve – at best – a few thousand users. By design, Starlink must have a very narrow focus for its antennas. We figure each of these 9,000 satellites look down on an area that's 1.5 degrees by 1.5 degrees – a moving box that's 65 miles per side.

So Starlink works great on land, especially in remote areas. But in populated areas like New York City or Washington, D.C., there can be far more demand for Starlink than supply.

A second problem for Starlink is that around 70% of Earth's surface is covered in water. Once a Starlink satellite is 65 miles over the ocean, there's no downlink station it can reach. At least, that was true for Starlink's v1 satellites.

In 2018, SpaceX received approval from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to use the V-Band of the wireless spectrum. V-Band has billions of waves per second – beyond ultrahigh frequency – so you can send billions of bytes wirelessly. But V-Band is disrupted by weather. So it doesn't work on Earth. That's why phone companies use the C-Band. Still, V-Band is ideal for SpaceX's Internet in space because above 50,000 feet, there are no clouds. So nothing interrupts the V-Band there.

In 2022, SpaceX modified its Starlink constellation plan to use V-Band with its v2 mini satellites. The FCC gave SpaceX until July 2027 to launch these satellites and fully use the V-Band. Further, the FCC said SpaceX needed to launch 50% of these new V-Band satellites by July 2024. SpaceX needed to use V-Band spectrum or lose it.

So that's what SpaceX did. In 2023, SpaceX launched 43 missions to put V-Band v2 mini satellites in orbit, with up to 23 satellites per launch. That's more than 900 satellites. Since January 2024, SpaceX has been launching hundreds more v2 mini satellites with V-Band radios, plus a new antenna that can reach T-Mobile's (TMUS) spectrum.

Since July 2024, these satellites have been used by Hawaiian Airlines to offer free Internet connectivity to its passengers over the Pacific Ocean.

However, Hawaiian Airlines doesn't have many flights per day that cross the Pacific Ocean. So it's a low bar with user demand. But in principle, it's Internet access from space.

And it's a lot more bandwidth for users than competitor satellite-communications company Iridium (IRDM) can supply with its LEO satellite to LEO satellite radios in space. Iridium's network is built for calls, not for Internet streaming.

However, SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk wants to do better than that... He wants his network to offer high-speed streaming across the globe with lasers.

You see, space lasers are superior to radios for moving military data because lasers can't be jammed or intercepted. But you can still encrypt space laser communications. You can even encode your data within satellites. And lasers can move a lot more data. They can be the backhaul network for the entire Internet.

A space laser communications network has broad applications in supporting Internet access over open oceans for cruise ships and transatlantic or transpacific flights, plus military applications.

That's why Musk claims his space Internet is "laser powered." But in reality, this network is powered by the V-Band, not lasers.

As SpaceX told the U.S. Government Accountability Office in February 2025, connecting space lasers is very difficult. It's because Starlink's satellites are not optimized for that.

So for the time being, Starlink only uses lasers to point a satellite's V-Band antennas to the next satellite.

You don't have to take my word for this... SpaceX is part of a giant U.S. Space Force project called Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture – which at least so far, does not work.

The big idea is to create secure laser communications in space from a lower orbit. The project uses lots of satellites, not one big one in geostationary orbit ("GEO"). This makes the system more resilient and more expensive. Overall, the Space Force will spend $35 billion on this project.

But there's better technology out there that can meet global demand for high-definition streaming on NATO+ military drones, plus Internet on cruise ships and transoceanic flights. One small company has a first-mover advantage in this space. And its constellation will cost more like $3.5 billion. You have to love big government programs. Ten times the price? That's a fine use of your tax dollars.

Still, it presents an opportunity for investors as the next space race heats up.

Good investing,

Dave Lashmet


Editor's note: Dave has found multiple winners in the aerospace and defense sectors. Now, he believes he has found another one in the satellite build-out. But it's not the SpaceX IPO. It's a smaller, little-known company tied to DARPA's "Project Blackjack" that could serve as a critical component in transmitting data to and from satellites.

And this is the last time that Dave is making a public warning like this. Get the full details on June 4 and hear how you can get positioned to profit from this new shift in the Internet infrastructure.

Tomorrow is Monday. Jeff's live session is for members only.

The replay is still up. Get inside before tomorrow's session.  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
fb tw ig
 

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

PO Box 24790
Christiansted, Virgin Islands 00824, United States

Terms of Service

China’s plans are going up in smoke

Some wins aren't worth bragging about.
View in browser
Bloomberg

This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, a total rejection of the critical and commercial systems of Bloomberg Opinion’s opinions. On Sundays, we look at the major themes of the week past and how they will define the week ahead. Sign up for the daily newsletter here.

Cigarette Daydreams

There is a lot of worry these days about China catching up or passing the US in all sorts of things that are becoming ever more vital in our world: AI, quantum computing, R&D spending, green technology, EVs, public transit, academic science papers, hypersonic weapons, and so on. That list often favors quantity rather than quality, but as my colleague Admiral James Stavridis likes to say, sometimes quantity has a quality of its own, which we hope isn’t the case in warships. 

America’s geopolitical Chicken Littles, though, conveniently elide some things China shouldn’t be so proud of dominating: coal plant construction, giant-clam slaughtering, Big Brotherism, executions, endangered-species trafficking, mercury pollution, journalist imprisonmentghost cities [1]  and, of course, greenhouse gas emissions.

Now we can add lighting up to that list: “Cigarette consumption in China rose 39 percent from 2003 to 2023, even as it fell 26 percent in the rest of the world,” reports the New York Times. “The 2.4 trillion cigarettes sold in China each year account for nearly half the global total.”

Smoking may be bad for the user, but it’s hugely profitable for China’s cigarette monopoly, which raked in $244 billion in profit and tax revenue last year, or about what Beijing claims it spends on defense. [2]  

Chinese leader Xi Jinping quit the habit years ago; his subjects, not so much. But that’s not the only bad habit Beijing can’t seem to kick. It’s also addicted to harassing Filipino warships.

Here’s the backstory: In the late 1990s, the Philippines deliberately grounded the Sierra Madre, a World War II-era tank carrier, on the Second Thomas Shoal to create a rusting military citadel. For years, China worked to block resupply missions to the small garrison. Now, ships are allowed to bring in supplies every six weeks or so, which is big progress, considering that in 2016, an international court resoundingly ruled that Beijing’s actions in Filipino waters were flatly illegal. [3]

Even with the law on its side, the Philippines is going to need a lot of help against the belligerent Asian superpower. But as time goes on, the US is becoming less and less willing to supply the aid — and its allies are taking note.

“The old model of security — with Washington firmly at the center — is giving way to a new Asian power structure faster than many expected,” writes Karishma Vaswani. “Sixteen months into President Donald Trump’s second term, Asian nations are facing reality and actively preparing for a time when American support may not be guaranteed.”

How can America’s Asian allies help themselves? With THE BOMB, maybe: “It is hardly surprising that Seoul is debating its own nuclear weapons program. The conversation in Tokyo is quieter given its own horrific experience of US atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” Karishma writes.

The Japanese may be hesitant on the nuclear front, but they’re resolute on the conventional one. “Japan is in the fourth year of an aggressive five-year plan to create an elite military. It is raising defense spending from 1% to 2% of GDP, and within a few years it could potentially have the world’s third-largest military budget, behind only the US and China,” writes Admiral Stavridis.

James was in Japan last week to talk with top officials about how this pile of yen should be spent. Naval strength was near the top of everybody’s list, he reports: “Some advocated following in Australia’s footsteps and approaching the US about a cooperative program for obtaining advanced nuclear submarines. While the Japanese build world-class diesel subs (notably the Taigei class lithium-ion powered boats), they understand that nuclear attack boats, as quiet as they are lethal, are the apex predators of the oceans.” 

As Japan and the Philippines harden themselves against Chinese aggression, Karishma says another Asian country is walking the tightrope. “If you want a blueprint for how countries can survive this era of great power rivalry, look no further than Vietnam,” she writes in a separate column. “A focus on economic growth and a determination to avoid dependence on any single power has transformed it into one of Asia’s most successful states. Hanoi offers a model for how nations straddling the line between the US and China can thrive even during uncertainty.”

Going it alone isn’t an option for Taiwan: Despite having a GDP per capita more than seven times the size of Vietnam’s, it’s utterly reliant on the unreliable man in the White House.

“The world may be transfixed by the US-Iran drama, but countries in the Western Pacific are also closely watching something else: the saga of an arms deal involving Taiwan,” Hal Brands writes. “The fate of a record-breaking US weapons deal with Taipei has become a test of whether President Donald Trump can pursue strong, competitive policies even while he engages diplomatically with China — or whether he is sliding toward a disastrous posture of accommodation.”

The precarious position of the island President Xi calls the “renegade province” is another reason that “closer ties between Japan and the Philippines are important,” adds Karishma. Geography increasingly looks like destiny: 

Let’s chalk up another item to the list of Chinese accomplishments: World leader in turning its neighbors against itself. 

Bonus Ashes to Ashes Reading:

What’s the World Got in Store?

  • NBA Finals start, June 3: It’s Time to Sell the Knicks — Adam Minter
  • India GDP, rate decision, June 5: An Iran Deal Won’t Plug India’s Capital or AI Gaps — Andy Mukherjee
  • US jobs report, June 5: Nobody Knows What ‘Working Class’ Even Means AnymoreAllison Schrager

You’ve Got the Silver

America is brimming with anticipation over Trump’s “Great American State Fair” on the National Mall to celebrate 250 years of America being America. [4]  So we were all thrilled, I’m sure, to learn about the musical lineup last week. I mean, when you’ve signed Vanilla Ice, everything else is just the cherry on top, right? Bret Michaels and Martina McBride, natch, but also Flo Rida and a bunch of other acts. Or maybe not a bunch of other acts: “Young MC, Morris Day and the Time, the C+C Music Factory and The Commodores each shared statements online announcing they will not perform at the concert,” despite being on the official list, reported The Hill. Then McBride pulled out. Followed by Michaels. But at least we still have ... Fab Morvan of Milli Vanilli, a group that is also a world leader: Band with most class action suits against it for lip syncing an entire album!

That miming duo released only two studio albums, [5] which makes them pikers compared to Drake, who just released three new albums on the same day. Was it a shameless attempt to increase his relevance? An ego-driven exemplar of greedy excess? Or something more meaningful?

“Philosophically, the releases were a total rejection of the critical and commercial systems that often define the music business,” writes Peter A. Berry. “With each platinum plaque and each unconventional release strategy, Drake has drifted further from the traditional rap canon. It’s a growth pattern that began at the start of his career, one in which he’s displayed an acute sense of his power, the world and his relationship to both.”

Before last week’s drop, Drake had 11 platinum albums and nearly 100 “Platinum-certified efforts,” whatever that means. John Authers is into music and precious metals as well. Here’s his list:

John asks for other examples. In the face of China’s globe-topping achievements, the PacRim allies’ distrust of the US, a potential proliferation race in Asia, a dearth of Tridacna gigas in the South China Sea and a semiquincentennial version of Ice Ice Baby, I’ll nominate Take My Hand, Precious Lord.

Note: Please send nicotine patches and feedback to Tobin Harshaw at tharshaw@bloomberg.net

[1] As anybody who read last week's newsletter knows, I would not live in one of those.

[2] Admiral Stavridis takes issue with that official figure -- it is a massive underestimate -- and has data to back it up.

[3] For a more detailed look at the fascinating tale of the Sierra Madre, see this report from the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, part of the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a military think tank in Washington.

[4] Here's a thought exercise: Which side of the American Revolutionary War do you think you would have come down on? I don't know if it's NYC homerism or just plain common sense, but I gotta say I find the British case more compelling.

[5] Half the pair, Rob Pilatus, died of an overdose in 1998, leaving only Fab Morvan.

Follow Us

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.

Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. Learn more.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Opinion Today newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices

AMD: +389% in 5 days, spotted before it moved

The traders who caught it weren't reading the news. They were reading something else.  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ...