Critics of Elon Musk's efforts to cut the federal government have turned their ire to his car company, Tesla, and owners of its stock. Shruti Singh is here today to explain what happens when politics collides with the financial reality of a pension fund. Plus: A close-knit California neighborhood has its advantages when facing wildfire, and the economics of baseball don't work for small-market teams. If this email was forwarded to you, click here to sign up. At a town hall event in Wisconsin on Sunday night, Elon Musk was candid about the effect his White House work is having on his car company, Tesla Inc. "It's costing me a lot to be in this job," he said, referring to his leadership of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. "My Tesla stock and the stock of everyone who holds Tesla has gone, went roughly in half. I mean it's a big deal." It's a very big deal, indeed, for the former teachers who wonder how a swoon in stocks, and specifically a plunge in Tesla shares, will hit their already underfunded pensions. Tesla stock was down as much as 56% earlier this month, plunging from a record $488.54 a share on Dec. 18. The shares spiraled as Tesla's sales slumped, the threat of tariffs set off panic and Musk forged ahead to meet President Donald Trump's goal to downsize the federal government. This week will be crucial for Tesla, as it's poised to announce sales figures for its most recent quarter on Wednesday, and Trump's 25% tariff increase on imported cars is set to go into effect on Thursday. The company has also been the target of "Tesla Takedown" protests that call on Musk's opponents to sell their cars and dump their stock. The Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund posted a statement on its website on March 14 explaining its Tesla stock ownership after seeing "social media outreach" about the retirement plan's holdings. As of a day earlier, its asset managers had held 209,744 Tesla shares worth about $50.5 million, or 0.4% of the portfolio, with most in passive funds. "These 'indexed funds' rise and fall with the market," Carlton W. Lenoir Sr., CTPF's executive director, said in the statement. "That can be seen as both a strength and a limitation because we own the market, and do not get to select individual stocks with these investments." While asset managers oversee investment decisions and serve as fiduciaries who manage the portfolio in the best interests of members, CTPF is dedicated to "a well-diversified and financially sound investment portfolio, ensuring the long-term financial health of the Fund," Chief Investment Officer Fernando Vinzons said in an emailed statement. Teachers in the Windy City aren't alone in questioning the holdings. American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten in a letter last month asked the country's biggest money managers to immediately review investments in Tesla. The California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) has received more than two dozen emails since January asking it to divest from Tesla. Weingarten at a rally outside of the US Department of Education headquarters in Washington on March 13. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg Weingarten—who's traded a few personal barbs with Musk—noted in her letter that Tesla's lower profits, pricing power and stock pose a risk to pensions. Public school teachers across the country are concerned about DOGE potentially cutting funding or dismantling the Department of Education completely. They also worry about who's accessing their private data. The Chicago teachers' fund got a couple of direct inquiries about the holdings in addition to the social media posts but no demands to divest, according to a statement. Still, a key difference between the Chicago teachers' fund and the likes of CalSTRS is the funding—or more precisely the lack of funding—and the significance of returns. At yearend, CalSTRS owned about $1.12 billion in Tesla shares as part of a massive $350 billion pension fund with enough assets to cover 75% of its liabilities. Meanwhile, the Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund ratio of assets to liabilities stands at 48%. Its unfunded liability stands at nearly $14 billion. That's largely because of decades of anemic contributions and volatile returns. Assuming statutorily required contributions and a 6.5% investment return, the fund is expected to reach a 90% funded ratio by 2059. "This is a severely underfunded plan," according to its most recent actuarial report, which included the results of a stress test to show the impact of various levels of returns. The total amount of required employer contributions will depend on the returns, according to the report. While concerns voiced about a particular stock are common among public employees or retirees when it's in the news for a negative reason, no single stock will impact pension portfolios as much as the sweeping impact that policies such as tariffs by the Trump administration are having on market and portfolios, said Anthony Randazzo, the executive director of Equable Institute, a bipartisan nonprofit focused on pensions. Similar concerns had popped up a couple of years ago regarding Silicon Valley Bank and now-defunct crypto exchange FTX Trading Ltd., he said. The situation at the Chicago teachers pension "speaks to the potential focus on particularly poorly funded systems when the stock market is going down," Randazzo said. Related: US Stocks Fall, Bonds Gain as Fears Build Ahead of Trump Tariffs |
No comments:
Post a Comment