Good morning frens,
I have unfortunate news to report. In their latest report, Fidelity did a DCF on ETH, and in their sensitivity table, even with their most bullish scenario of a 5% terminal growth rate and 8% discount rate, the present value of ETH should be $3,612. That's not a lot of upside. I thought we all agreed that ETH would be going to $10K?
"It seems unlikely that any other digital asset could improve upon Bitcoin as a monetary good because Bitcoin is viewed by some as the most secure, decentralized, sound digital money to this point, and any "improvement" would require tradeoffs." Evidently, these analysts have not met ETH ultrasound money maxis.
However, they did note that "modeling the future of any growth-sensitive asset and applying an associated discount rate is highly subjective, and therefore, valuation may only be useful in theory." I'll take it as we like valuation frameworks if we like the price target (pls gib VanEck $51K ETH target). If we don't like it, then we'll stick with our TA.
Starknet has run into a bit of a PR disaster, as the network upgraded to new contracts, which meant that any wallet accounts using old contracts were deprecated and could no longer be accessed. This caused some uproar within the crypto community, because I thought we were all here for a public, permissionless, and immutable ledgers?
The devs said that "we communicated this with a permanent banner within the wallet, and several posts across our social channels" and further said that "the wallets that did not upgrade in time will lose their assets." This was meant to occur on August 21st.
It turns out, they can magically restore access to all these accounts (containing $550K) which they had previously stated users would no longer have access to. I'm not an expert, but this saga isn't exactly giving off a huge amount of decentralized vibes. Especially if users can lose access to their wallets, and then suddenly someone can flip a switch for users to restore access to these wallets. But oh well, what do I know, someone posted a discord message of a STRK token soon anyway. That's what we're here for, right?
In another win for crypto, the court sided with Uniswap in a class action lawsuit, which alleged that Uniswap was responsible for "rampant fraud" on the exchange. However, the court said that "due to the protocol's decentralized nature, the identities of the scam token issuers are basically unknown and unknowable, leaving plaintiffs with an identifiable injury but no identifiable defendant." In the most optimistic interpretation, it means that protocol devs aren't liable when someone else misuses their protocol, especially if there is no centralized ownership structure. Big wins for Mr.Hayden Adams.
Now all that is left to close off this wonderful week of legal news would be the spot Bitcoin ETF decisions for iShares, Bitwise, VanEck, Widsomtree, and Invesco who all have initial deadlines set for Friday or Saturday. A man can dream.
- purplepill3m
No comments:
Post a Comment