| By Jeremy Hodges A year ago, a Dutch judge ordered Shell to slash its emissions harder and faster than planned. Victorious campaigners and lawyers declared the win would straighten up the biggest polluters and serve as a warning to others. But that hasn't happened yet. Climate litigation like the kind successfully brought against Shell is a crucial part of the toolkit needed hold companies and governments accountable for their climate promises and slow global warming. So what's taking so long?  Militza Flaco, a climate activist from Panama, right, uses a mobile device to take a 'selfie' photograph with Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, center, following a news conference outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. in 2019. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg Part of the problem is the process. Putting together a successful case is incredibly challenging and can take years to conclude — the Shell case itself is still mired in appeals with no end date in sight. Costs can be prohibitive, requiring a team of expensive lawyers well in advance of the first day in court. That means the barrier to entry for nonprofits and individuals is often way too high, especially when taking on the financial might of Big Oil. Despite the difficulties, there's been an explosion in the number of climate lawsuits globally. Their number now hovers at nearly 2,000, according to the London School of Economics' Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. One reason is that governments have adopted more laws tied to climate change as the scientific case to act with urgency has grown stronger. That's allowed lawyers to bring cases that would have been impossible previously. More importantly, several years of bold claims by companies making net-zero pledges and setting recycling targets has provided a new set of standards against which they can be judged. In many countries, government regulation isn't strong enough to ensure businesses live up to their environmental goals, leading to increased support from civil society for court cases that seek to bring accountability. But how those cases progress has depended on the political and legal environments of different nations. In climate-forward Europe, the nonprofit Greenpeace sued TotalEnergies SE in France earlier this year for allegedly misleading the French public when it said would reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. A German cattle-and-grain farmer, among other citizens, is trying to force Volkswagen AG to reduce its production of polluting cars to zero by 2030. Both of these cases — at very early stages — could serve as indicators of how climate litigation plays out in Europe over the coming years and whether judges feel comfortable setting climate policy. In the Volkswagen case, the judge has mused about whether the regional court is the best forum for the debate, suggesting it may be better suited for government to decide. A separate group of German judges decided they needed to asses the impacts of climate change firsthand. They recently visited a Peruvian mountain range to gather evidence over whether energy giant RWE is partly responsible for the rise in greenhouse gases that could cause deadly flooding. There are signs that courts could become more permissive in the US, where wins for the climate have been harder to come by. The top appeals court of Massachusetts ruled earlier this month that Exxon Mobil Corp. must face a lawsuit by the state accusing it of misleading investors and consumers about the impact of climate change on its business. As for the UK, where there have been some notable successes, opportunities to bring cases against the government for failing to live up to its climate policies will soon to become harder to come by. The Conservative government has expressed concerns about what it sees as frivolous lawsuits that clog up the system. However, it stopped short of sweeping reform that would impact what's known as a judicial review — the only route citizens can take the government to court. Overall, legal processes in developed countries appear to be inching forward to better embrace climate violations. It's sometimes frustratingly slowly, but courts will play a crucial role in changing how companies behave. As recent research from the Grantham Institute shows, courts are becoming an increasingly popular destination to raise issues. Last year saw the highest number of climate cases filed against private companies, mainly in the energy sector, though agriculture and food industries have also been targeted over greenwashing claims. Still, winning a case is rare. So much has to fall into place for a successful outcome. It's not just about strong arguments and a well-funded team, but also a judiciary with an open mind and a political landscape that doesn't suppress climate lawsuits. Jeremy Hodges is the European legal news team leader at Bloomberg News in London. Like getting the Green Daily newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to breaking news on climate and energy, data-driven reporting and graphics, Bloomberg Green magazine and more. You can read today's newsletter on the web here. Calling all filmmakers. Bloomberg Green Docs is open for submissions. We want to see your short documentaries on climate change. Submit your film by September 16 and compete to win a $25,000 grand prize, plus the opportunity to showcase your work at a special screening in Los Angeles on October 26. | 
No comments:
Post a Comment