| | The Ethereum developer community is deep in crisis management mode as it tries to rescue Holesky, the testnet intended to be the largest and longest-lived in Ethereum's history. Instead, Holesky has become a cautionary tale about testing the limits of coordination among validators. What do these problems signal for the Pectra hard fork on mainnet? | | | Bitcoin Ordinal transaction count: | | Bitcoin Ordinal transactions are seeing something of a revival since their virality in 2023. In February 2025, there were 4.1 million Ordinal-related transactions alone, represented by the gray charts above. | This translated to about $2.6 million in transaction fees, a fraction of Ordinals' December 2023 peak of $90k in transaction fees. | | Magic Eden chief business officer Chris Akhavan said: "Bitcoin Ordinals had a big run in February fueled by the Ordinal Maxi Biz 'Black Eyes' launch. We also saw strong volume across other blue chip collections like Bitcoin Puppets, Quantum Cats and NodeMonkes. There are a couple big projects rumored to be launching soon, so we expect to see the Ordinals market continue to heat up as the year progresses." | — Donovan Choy | | | Don't get left behind. Subscribe to The Drop, Blockworks' latest newsletter covering crypto apps, art, gaming, memecoins and more. | | | Holesky to be saved | The hard fork for the Pectra upgrade on Ethereum's largest testnet, Holesky, saw the chain split in two. With validators scattered across two chains and slashing protections preventing an easy fix, the network became stuck in a state of non-finality. | Over the past week, developers have thrown everything at the problem. A coordinated slashing event was planned to purge the invalid chain and push Holesky back to finality. Yet, even with patches improving client synchronization, the validator set has remained below the 66% threshold needed for finality. While participation has climbed to 53%, developers now estimate that finality may not be reached until March 28. | The failure to finalize has sparked some debate among Ethereum's core developers. Some, like CarlBeek, suggested in the aftermath of the bug that Holesky isn't worth saving, and Ethereum should spin up a replacement testnet instead. Testnets are disposable, and forcing a broken network back to life could waste valuable dev resources. | Others strongly disagree. Holesky is supposed to be supported until 2027. Newly appointed EF co-executive director Tomasz Stanczak stated that making Holesky operational again is a "war mode test" for client teams. If Ethereum developers can't restore Holesky, what does that say about their ability to maintain mainnet's resilience? | For staking protocols like Lido, Holesky is mission-critical. Lido contributor Ivan Metrikin warned on today's Consensus Layer call that without finalizing Holesky, testing staking integrations, monitoring and oracles become nearly impossible. | "For us, it's really critical that it works," Metrikin said, noting that on the plus side, Holesky will provide an opportunity to test Lido's "bunker mode" in a production environment — a sort of silver lining. | In the near term, developers plan to fork Holesky as an additional testnet so as not to lose momentum for a Pectra mainnet launch. But to truly serve as a replacement, it would need to be as large as Holesky, with comparable validator participation, tooling and protocol deployments — an expensive and time-consuming process. | Another concern expressed on the call is that launching a new testnet would cause teams to abandon Holesky, turning it into a "second-class citizen." | Still, this shadow fork is seen as a compromise to allow testing to proceed this month until Holesky is back on track. The shadow fork may end up serving as the primary testing ground for Pectra, as devs speculate that redistributing validator keys to fully restore Holesky could take up to a year. | It's unclear how long teams will maintain this new shadow fork, but they did agree to spin down both Devnet 7 and the temporary Mekong testnet. | Wen Pectra? | The Holesky situation isn't a direct risk to Ethereum — it was an edge case specific to the testnet — but it is a bad look. | And it will delay the Pectra mainnet upgrade slightly. Core developers on the call agreed not to move forward with setting a date for the fork until Holesky finalizes in a few weeks. | One positive sign is that Gnosis' Chiado testnet implemented the Pectra fork, which was reportedly a success. The EVM-compatible Gnosis chain has historically proceeded to fork its mainnet a few weeks in advance of Ethereum. | For now, Ethereum Foundation researcher Alex Stokes — who moderated the call — signed off on an optimistic note when it comes to Holesky: "It's been a lot of work and we're in the middle of it, but we'll get it back." | — Macauley Peterson | | | Is Unichain a failure? | After about a month since launching, TVL on the L2 has been a lackluster $8.3 million. | To spur activity, Uniswap is turning to the tried and true method of incentives. DAO governance passed an early temperature check vote on Sunday to launch a $45 million liquidity campaign. The onchain vote to finalize the proposal will take place sometime in March. | | The proposal doesn't come without criticisms. @0xPEPO points out the elephant in the room that Unichain is a product owned by Uniswap Labs, rather than Uniswap DAO. When Unichain was announced back in October, DAO participants and delegates complained that the DAO was left out of community decision-making and were caught off guard by the announcement. | Keyrock, a European-based market maker, also questions the proposal's broad spray-and-pray strategy, pointing to the poor performance of liquidity incentives on various other chains such as Mode, Manta and Blast. | — Donovan Choy | | | Calling the Builders Who Move Fast | If you're engineering the next generation of crypto — whether it's infrastructure, DeFi, or something entirely new — you belong on the Permissionless stage. | Speaker applications are open. If you're a technical founder, CTO, or dev, this is your chance to share, debate, and push the space forward. | And for those ready to prove it with code? The Hackathon is your shot. $100K+ prize bounty. Investors watching. No gimmicks — just shipping. | | | |  | Uttam @uttam_singhk |  |
| |
Holesky done Sepolia done All eyes on Mainnet now🤞 The ticker is ETH | |  | | 8:00 AM • Mar 5, 2025 | | | | 457 Likes 61 Retweets | 22 Replies |
|
|  | Gnosis Chain 🦉 @gnosischain |  |
| |
Pectra upgrade is now live on the Chiado testnet 🎉 A huge thank you to @NethermindEth@ErigonEth & @gateway_eth for their exceptional contributions to the network's success. Up next ➡️ Gnosis Chain mainnet | |  | | 11:30 AM • Mar 6, 2025 | | | | 59 Likes 18 Retweets | 5 Replies |
|
|
|  | Yuri Tkachenko @tamtamchik |  |
| |
This can only occur on Holesky This can only occur on Sepolia ← You are here → This can only occur on Mainnet | | 11:17 AM • Mar 5, 2025 | | | | 8 Likes 3 Retweets | 1 Reply |
|
|  | Hart Lambur (⛺️,⛺️) @hal2001 |  |
| |
Incentive structure design: @bgarlinghouse wants XRP in the reserve, but knows it won't get included if SOL isn't, so he promotes SOL getting included too. @aeyakovenko prob doesn't want XRP in there (for legit reasons), but he also doesn't want ETH included unless SOL is, so… x.com/i/web/status/1… | toly 🇺🇸 @aeyakovenko
My reserve order of preference 1. No reserve, because if you want decentralization to fail you'd put the government in charge of it. 2. Or states run their own reserve as a hedge against the fed making a mistake 3. Or if there has to be a reserve, it's based on objectively… x.com/i/web/status/1…x.com/laurashin/stat… |
| | 10:15 AM • Mar 6, 2025 | | | | 88 Likes 4 Retweets | 17 Replies |
|
| |
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment