Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Did tariffs just light the economy on fire?

Lots of folks Googled "recession" today.
Bloomberg

This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, the most plausible outcome of Bloomberg Opinion's opinions. Sign up here.

Today's Agenda

One Trade War, Coming Right Up

He actually did it! I don't know why I'm surprised. President Donald Trump said he was serious about the tariffs. But it's kinda like when your eternally messy and unreliable roommate tells you they're gonna take out the garbage the next morning and then they really do it? Anyway, now we're here:

But we might not be here for long: "Both the Mexicans and the Canadians were on the phone with me all day today trying to show that they'll do better, and the president's listening, because you know he's very, very fair and very reasonable," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox Business this afternoon.

Even if we end up seeing some tariff relief, as Lutnick suggested, everyone and their mother ran to Google to search "recession" today. That's something no president wants to happen on their watch:

The stock market famously isn't the economy, but giving portfolios whiplash like this can't be good. "Stock market gains have become an increasingly important driver of consumer spending," as Conor Sen points out in his recent column. And the consumer psyche is a delicate thing. Back in January, Claudia Sahm said mere talk of tariffs could lead to inflation. So you can only imagine how people are reacting now that they're actually here. It feels as if we've gone from worrying about the price of eggs to fearing a full-blown cost-of-living crisis overnight.

Mohamed A. El-Erian is rattled by the rapidly increasing odds of a downturn: "While still relatively low, my probability of a recession has increased from 10% at the beginning of the year to 25% to 30% today," he writes. "This is a consequential and quite unsettling development for an economy with high potential and aspirations."

It's certainly an awkward day to be that blonde lady from the White Lotus who probably voted for Trump "because of the economy." But hey, maybe this is all by designMaybe the Trump administration is purposefully crashing the economy to lower mortgage rates. Or at least, that's what they want you to think. But as Jonathan Levin warned last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's admirable goal of bringing down 10-year Treasury yields could backfire and "torpedo growth." His control over the narrative might not last for long.

Speaking of controlling the narrative: Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau went after Trump Tuesday morning: "You're a very smart guy. This is a very dumb thing to do." How dumb? Well, let's see: Trump wants farmers to "have fun" and increase production when his tariffs on external agricultural products begin on April 2. But the US gets 80% of its potash — a key ingredient in farm fertilizer — from Canada. Come spring, the crops of the "Great Farmers of the United States" could be doomed.

But April is a long way away and Trump has more pressing concerns. Like the joint address he's delivering to Congress Tuesday night. While it's not technically a "State of the Union" speech — he's only been in office for 43 days — it may offer us a window into how the Trump administration is navigating its self-made chaos. Or, more likely, his speech will only add to the noise.

The thing is, Americans deserve real answers to their questions: How might this trade war shake out? Will the DOGE exodus help balance the budget? And how will all that affect inflation? To get some idea of where we're headed, Bloomberg Opinion looked back to see what Trump did the last time he was in office, as well as what he inherited from former President Joe Biden. In a new, free-to-read data feature, our columnists analyzed a dozen metrics that lay out the challenges and opportunities for this administration. To give you a taste, here's three stand-out charts that speak to our current moment.

The Job Market

"Trump is inheriting an economy where a record stretch of job creation has left just 4% of the labor force unemployed, a rate most presidents would be thrilled with," Jonathan Levin writes. But cracks are starting to appear, thanks to the all the tariff talk and economic uncertainty: Resignations are plummeting. Executives are stalling. And the federal payroll is shrinking with each new day. "Future phases of the Trump agenda — namely, deregulation and tax cuts — should be more labor-market friendly," he writes. "The risk is that it will be too little, too late."

Energy Costs

In the eyes of Trump, America is in the midst of a full-blown "energy emergency." But Liam Denning is wondering whether the emergency is in the room with us, because he sure isn't seeing one.

"Gasoline, other fuels and utility bills swallowed an average 3.4% of disposable personal income in December. That's far below levels during actual energy crises of the past and lower than the average across Trump's first term, which included a pandemic-related crash in energy consumption and prices," he writes. "Such disasters, along with recessions, do occasionally cause pump prices, the most prominent energy cost for most Americans, to plunge suddenly — but they hardly benefit the presiding government."

On top of all that, tariffs on Canadian energy are expected to raise — not lower — prices, which Patricia Lopez has previously said could be a gut-punch to Michigan and Wisconsin residents. In the event that tariffs eventually lead to a downturn, don't be surprised if Trump starts bragging about falling gas prices. He did that during a literal pandemic. Chances are, he wouldn't treat a recession any differently.

Inequality

A cool thing that happened during Trump's first term? Low earners got a major money boost, thanks to housing. Allison Schrager says the cohort experienced a "31% increase in net worth, in part, because their portfolios are dominated by real estate (if they own at all), which appreciated for that group more rapidly than stocks."

That wealth bump happened under Biden, too, but Trump's gains were slightly more impressive. If he wants to repeat that success, he'll need to expand access to homeownership. One way to do that? Unfreeze the market by lowering mortgage rates — a move that, as we know, could come with negative trade-offs for the economy. An economy, remind you, that John Authers says is already flashing red in the face of tariffs.

Hungry for more? Check out our Tuesday livestream or join Candice Zachariahs, Robert Burgess and Jonathan Levin for a live Q&A on Wednesday, March 5, at 10:00 a.m. EST.

This is only a slice of our opinion coverage. To unlock every story and get full access to all our columnists, become a Bloomberg.com subscriber.

Finally, Some Optimism

In lieu of our usual charts, we're highlighting something hopeful! I know, I know … positivity is hard to come by these days, what with Portlanders getting infected with dysentery and Elon Musk unironically retweeting posts about George Orwell's 1984. But there is one bright spot amid the gloom. There's a new vaccine for the third-deadliest cancer in the US: pancreatic cancer. "The trial was tiny, just 16 patients, but it's eliciting a sentiment not normally associated with this brutal disease: hope," Lisa Jarvis writes.

Pancreatic cancer patients are a historically underserved group. "Progress has been too slow," she writes, and this encouraging study should be a wake-up call for scientists. "Even with slow and steady progress over the last decade toward improving survival rates, just 13% of people are alive five years after they are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer."

To continue fighting the deadly disease, researchers need more funding though. Given the cuts at the NIH, Lisa worries the scientific community will lose its momentum: "What a colossal failure that would be. This cancer has stolen so much from so many families. If there's a possibility for more people to benefit, we should be moving as quickly as possible to realize that potential."

Further Reading

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is on life support, but we can make it stronger. — Editorial Board

Other banks won't give you $6 billion for no reason, but there's a tiny chance that Citi might. — Matt Levine

Trump is toying with an unprecedented crypto intervention. What could possibly go wrong? — Lionel Laurent

How did America go from Thomas Jefferson to a chainsaw-wielding billionaire? — Justin Fox

Trump may not like to hear it, but California is what makes America great. — Matthew A. Winkler

Resilient Chinese tech stocks are challenging the lasting power of US exceptionalism. — Shuli Ren

DeepSeek's eye-popping cost-profit margin of 545% comes with an asterisk. — Catherine Thorbecke

7-Eleven is avoiding confrontation with its Canadian admirer. — Gearoid Reidy

ICYMI

Lawyers are using AI that hallucinates court cases.

BlackRock struck a deal for Panama ports.

Trump wants to sell hundreds of federal properties.

Kickers

This is your brain in middle school.

Dr. Pimple Popper knows you can't look away.

Woolly mammoth mouse? What the hell, sure.

Sweetgreen launched french fries.

Notes: Please send fries and feedback to Jessica Karl at jkarl9@bloomberg.net.

Sign up here and find us on BlueskyTikTokInstagramLinkedIn and Threads.

Follow Us

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can't find anywhere else. Learn more.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Opinion Today newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices

No comments:

Post a Comment