"She's terribly worried that she won't be able to keep the house warm this winter," reported my mother last week through a furrowed brow, after returning from a trip to see a friend. As a heartless and hardnosed millennial, I replied that such an eventuality should not be possible, because Labour's cut to the winter fuel allowance was to be means tested. "Yes but she doesn't claim pensions credit — she's too proud," came the reply, to which it's possible that I regressed into full Kevin the Teenager mode and muttered something along the lines of: "Well, maybe she should." Little did I know that we were playing out a near preview of today's scenes in Parliament as Rachel Reeves tried to fend off intense criticism of the policy from opposition parties and some pointed questions from her own Labour backbenches. Charities and other pressure groups are also complaining to the chancellor, who, for now, is standing her ground. She needs to find billions of pounds in savings ahead of her October budget. Rachel Reeves Photographer: Hollie Adams/Bloomberg The divisive winter fuel allowance cut is far from the only thing threatening to keep Reeves awake at night. Businesses have been spooked by the prospect of sharp tax hikes and are still concerned about Labour's plans to bolster workers' rights. A group of CEOs visited Downing Street today for what No. 10 described as a "positive" discussion on the matter. Positive or not, it is still hard to see how business chiefs and trade union bosses all come out of this with smiles on their faces. The danger for Labour is that both sides feel they've lost. The party experienced something similar today as its decision to suspend about 30 arms licences to Israel triggered anger from senior British Jews and Labour's pro-Palestinian Members of Parliament alike. Welcome to government, some might say. Want this in your inbox each weekday? You can sign up here. |
No comments:
Post a Comment