Read the storyAmerica's system for deciding asylum cases is failing—and not only because it's overwhelmed. Inefficiency in immigration courts has helped feed a surge in new arrivals, given that applications for asylum—even flimsy ones—can take years to resolve. At the same time, vast inconsistencies in rulings show the outcomes often have more to do with luck, geography and political winds than merit. Almost everyone directly involved—asylum-seekers, immigration lawyers and many judges—says the system is unfair and in dire need of reform. The reverberations of this dysfunction are profound: Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo have streamed into US cities, fueling an acrimonious debate that's become a defining clash of the presidential election. Worthy applicants are being punished by the system's shortcomings, forcing some back into the custody of the governments they've fled, resulting in imprisonment, torture and even death. Read The Big Take. |
No comments:
Post a Comment