Wednesday, July 31, 2024

What election betting tells us

Plus: Calculating the value of an MBA

It's become somewhat trendy for the political chattering class to look beyond polls to betting markets to gauge what the electorate is thinking. There are pitfalls, though, as Emily Nicolle writes today. Plus: Businessweek introduces an amazing tool to determine whether an MBA will pay off for you. It's the Business School ROI Calculator. If this email was forwarded to you, click here to sign up.

In 2016, prediction markets put the likelihood of the UK voting for Brexit around 30%. Then, about a month before the US election, bettors gave Donald Trump a 1-in-4 chance of victory. Suffice to say, both those votes defied the odds.

To be fair, polls didn't do much better that year. But as we prepare for the 2024 US presidential election, the question remains: Have betting markets improved on their odds of correctly telling us about the future?

Betting isn't a science, and crowds don't always have wisdom. One way the accuracy of election betting could improve would be if more people spent money on such wagers. Polymarket, a crypto-based betting platform that covers sports and pop culture events, as well as politics, has seen demand for its services skyrocket since the start of the election year. The heightened liquidity theoretically makes its markets more representative of wider sentiment.

More than $600 million has been wagered on Polymarket in 2024 so far.  Operating on top of a blockchain network means information about its trading volume is publicly available, which the company says makes it a better source of real-time data about public sentiment than polling or traditional media.

Daily betting volumes have repeatedly set records, spurred by quick reactions to key events such as the July 15 selection of JD Vance as Trump's running mate or Trump's July 18 speech at the Republican National Convention. Joe Biden's exit from the race on July 21 holds the daily record on Polymarket, per blockchain data visible on Dune Analytics, charting some $28.3 million in trading volume.

"We've really found an insane amount of product-market fit recently, as we're currently in the US going through probably the most unpredictable and volatile election in living memory," David Rosenberg, Polymarket's vice president of strategy, told me in an interview last week. "People, especially since 2016 but perhaps even more so now, are growing more distrustful of polling and the media's use of polling as a predictive source."

Prediction markets still have some inherent flaws. The largest one is that they end up reflecting the biases that also exist in investment. Bettors are typically male or, at the very least, are representative of the views of people with money to spend.

In crypto, those factors are even more stark: Buyers are often younger, willing to take greater financial risks and are comfortable with engaging in unregulated territory. Polls, on the other hand, make a concerted effort to reach the widest possible variety of demographics before producing a conclusion.

The PredictIt betting market remains available in the US.  Photographer: Getty Images

It also should be noted that Polymarket isn't open to US residents, thanks to a 2022 settlement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Logic would follow, then, that its markets more accurately reflect the views of those not eligible to vote. (It's possible, of course, that some users dodge the geographical restrictions, as crypto traders' capacity for evading geotargeting is well-documented, but it's impossible to know how prevalent that is. The company didn't respond to a request for comment about how it blocks US access.) Rival platform PredictIt remains available in the US but only because it won a court injunction last year.

The debate around prediction markets' usefulness may be short-lived. The CFTC proposed a ban on so-called event contracts in May, arguing the widespread nature of such activity would go far beyond its mandate and turn the regulator into an "election cop." For the moment, insights like Trump's odds of victory increasing by 10% after an assassination attempt could prove a popular investment tool.

Related: In the latest Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll, Kamala Harris wiped out Donald Trump's lead across seven battleground states.

In Brief

Doing the Math on Business Schools' Value

Photo illustration by 731

When it comes to enrolling in business school, savvy consumers might already know that spending more doesn't necessarily mean a better return on your investment. Students tell us that increasing their earnings is a top reason for getting an MBA, so we want to be sure all prospective B-school applicants know this, too.

Bloomberg Businessweek's new ROI calculator is designed to help students evaluate the numbers to determine whether the time and expense of getting the advanced degree is worthwhile. The tool, which uses data reported to Bloomberg by MBA graduates for our annual Best B-Schools Rankings, includes factors such as loan interest and income foregone while enrolled.

Let's take a look at some numbers. The median cost of getting a degree from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania was $266,000 in today's dollars, including tuition and other living expenses, according to survey respondents who graduated from 2014 through 2023. That's the highest among the 77 US schools in our 2023 rankings. Yet, Wharton was eighth in the estimated 10-year difference between post- and pre-MBA compensation, and 19th in reported signing bonuses, the surveys show.

The bottom line, according to calculations based on survey data and Bloomberg estimates: The typical Wharton graduate could expect a 10-year net return on investment of about $678,000, or a compounded average rate of roughly 9% a year.

Dimitra Kessenides and Phil Kuntz explain the calculator here: How to Calculate the Value of an MBA

And if you're ready to dive right in: The Business School ROI Calculator 2024–25

The Politics of GunTube Are Complicated

Illustration: Erik Carter for Bloomberg Businessweek

When Thomas Michael Crooks climbed onto the roof of a building near Butler, Pennsylvania, and tried to kill Donald Trump, he had a distinctive, gunmetal-gray T-shirt. On the back there was an angular gray eagle, stylized like the crest of a futuristic army. The front featured one word: "DEMOLITIA."

The shirt comes from a YouTube channel called Demolition Ranch, which over the past 13 years has published thousands of videos featuring an almost uncountable arsenal of firearms. Crooks didn't leave many digital breadcrumbs, and his choice of the shirt, which retailed for about $30 from the channel's online store, is one of a few clues about his interests or ideology.

As a clue, though, it may not say much. The politics of GunTube, the sprawling world of firearms-focused social media influencers, aren't always clear. Demolition Ranch, which has 11.7 million subscribers, deliberately eschews all but the blandest political statements about the Second Amendment.

A typical Demolition Ranch video will show Matt Carriker, the owner and host of the channel, and his friends shooting something surprising with a very large gun. They may showcase a specific weapon, a certain type of bullet or even a real-world scenario involving firearms. But the general scope is exactly as advertised: fun-loving Texans shooting very large guns at things they want to blow up. Watermelons are a favorite, as are every GunTuber's top prop, a human-shaped dummy made of ballistic gel that can simulate a projectile's impact on flesh.

Jack Crosbie explains the subversive world of firearms influencers, where a successful channel can pull in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year through a mixture of ad revenue and direct sponsorships: Inside GunTube, the YouTube Subculture Linked to the Trump Shooter

Homebuyers Reappear

4.8%
That's how much the National Association of Realtors' index of contract signings rose in June. It's the first increase in three months as buyers looking to relocate or upgrade their houses braved elevated prices and borrowing costs.

An Olympic Milestone for Paris

"We have achieved in 4 years what was impossible for 100 years: The Seine is swimmable."
French President Emmanuel Macron
In a post on social media
After days of delays and criticism, the Olympic triathlon event finally got underway Wednesday in the Seine River. Authorities had earmarked €1.4 billion ($1.5 billion) to clean up bacteria in the river caused by overflowing sewers.

More From Bloomberg

Like Businessweek Daily? Check out these newsletters:

  • Business of Space for inside stories of investments beyond Earth
  • CFO Briefing for what finance leaders need to know
  • CityLab Daily for today's top stories, ideas and solutions, from cities around the world
  • Tech Daily for exclusive reporting and analysis on tech and AI
  • Green Daily for the latest in climate news, zero-emission tech and green finance

Explore all newsletters at Bloomberg.com.

Stay updated by saving our new email address

  • Gmail: Open an email from Bloomberg, click the three dots in the top right corner, select 'Mark as important.'
  • Outlook: Right-click on Bloomberg's email address and select 'Add to Outlook Contacts.'
  • Apple Mail: Open the email, click on Bloomberg's email address, and select 'Add to Contacts' or 'Add to VIPs.'
  • Yahoo Mail: Open an email from Bloomberg, hover over the email address, click 'Add to Contacts.'

No comments:

Post a Comment

5 things to start your day: Europe

Good morning. China's stunning stock rally continues. France mulls a new corporate tax. Car companies urge the European Union to...