In Aberdeen to kick off today's announcement Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was grumpy when asked how he had travelled there (private jet.) In an interview, he said he was not going to back policies that drive up costs for voters. His predecessor but one Boris Johnson had the same position — always talking about going green "without so much as a hair shirt in sight." Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak Photographer: DANIEL LEAL/AFP But even though neither men are keen on hair shirt climate politics, you can not move in the UK this wet August for talk that this government is ditching the Boris Johnson government's greenery. Bloomberg has this excellent primer on how Sunak might change things post-Boris Johnson: "Political rhetoric now leans towards a watering down of climate change policy. The unpopular Conservative government, facing electoral wipeout in next year's general election, is betting that there are votes in reassuring people that change will move more slowly." Today Sunak tied himself to the 2050 target: "I'm committed to net zero, but I'm also committed to our energy security and we will get to net zero in a proportionate and pragmatic way that doesn't unnecessarily burden families with costs or hassle that they don't really need in their lives right now." But it will include the 2030 ban on new petrol and diesel cars — a relief to Jaguar Land Rover who only weeks ago announced a new gigafactory in Somerset (this was a huge announcement and should have had the same communications treatment as today's Aberdeen trip). Other than that, we are told to expect a pivot away from green policies that cause pain. The trouble is, other than the now infamous ULEZ expansion that is credited with handing the Tories their unexpected Uxbridge win, it is not obvious what else is in that category. Perhaps it might be better to flip from pain to gain. As this brilliant piece by Bloomberg Opinion's Merryn Somerset Webb shows, the single biggest bottleneck to net zero is the National Grid. John Pettigrew of the National Grid can often be heard saying that in order to support a government target of 50GW of offshore wind in the next seven years, the National Grid will have to install more than five times the amount of transmission infrastructure than it has built in the last 30. On the surface of things, this too might be seen as another agenda for pain. Does that mean it, too, gets binned? Most suspect the answer will be a new regime of incentivising community benefits for local areas that accept new low carbon infrastructure running through their areas and fields. Sunak is a politician who prides himself on being the man for long term solutions. Community benefits may be one way to do it. He's told us he doesn't want to inflict pain on communities, but what about starting to talk about gains? |
No comments:
Post a Comment